February 17, 2011

resisting the intelligence, almost

Wallace Stevens said, "poetry must resist the intelligence almost successfully." What does that mean? Maybe it means that a poem is more than a collection of images that can be translated into something we might call "the meaning of the poem."

I would like to say something like that about painting: that a painting must resist the intelligence--the urge to explain the image--and that it must do this "almost" (but maybe not completely) "successfully".

So a painting might allow for any number of "explanations." It might invite the intelligence in and then present it with many puzzles.

3 comments:

  1. "Nothing touches a work of art so little as words of criticism: they always result in more or less fortunate misunderstandings. Things aren't all so tangible and “sayable” as people would usually have us believe; most experiences are “unsayable”, they happen in a space that no word has ever entered, and more “unsayable” than all other things are works of art, those mysterious existences, whose life endures beside our own small, transitory life" - wrote Rainer Maria Rilke in his “First Letter to a Young Poet.”

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's an old Hassidic proverb... that "a good story is like the blacksmith's hammer striking red hot metal... 77 sparks are created"
    beautiful paintings brother! Each is a story well told.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks JKK and Timothy! Beautiful additions to Stevens. I think a painting is more like a "story" than a "lesson." Unsayable and full of truth. A koan.

    ReplyDelete

Followers